Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
季
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 8 strokes
咲seasons
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →blossom, bloom
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
実咲季
4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameMisaki
みさき
咲月季
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameSatsuki
さつき
咲季依
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameSakie
さきえ
季咲良
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameKisara
きさら
千咲季
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameChisaki
ちさき
咲季
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameSaki
さき
咲季子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameSakiko
さきこ
季咲
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameKie
きえ
季咲
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameKisa
きさ
季咲
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameKisaki
きさき
咲季菜
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameSakina
さきな
咲季野
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Given nameSakino
さきの
小咲季
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 季 and 咲Kosaki
こさき
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.