Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
子
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 3 strokes
郎child, sign of the rat, 11PM-1AM
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →son, counter for sons
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
庚子郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameKōshirō
こうしろう
子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameShirō
しろう
金子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameKaneo
かねお
鬼子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameKishio
きしお
甲子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameKineo
きねお
甲子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameKishirō
きしろう
甲子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameKashio
かしお
唐子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameTōshirō
とうしろう
金子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameKinshirō
きんしろう
丙子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameHeigorō
へいごろう
雉子郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Given nameKijirō
きじろう
甲子太郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 子 and 郎Kanetarō
かねたろう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.