Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
Characters recorded with 子
Only partners appearing in at least two distinct source-recorded written forms are highlighted here. That threshold keeps one-off combinations from looking more established than the corpus supports.
子 + 美
538 distinct written forms · 641 source rows
89 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 実
349 distinct written forms · 370 source rows
75 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 奈
233 distinct written forms · 261 source rows
51 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 津
211 distinct written forms · 268 source rows
50 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 恵
201 distinct written forms · 241 source rows
55 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 真
197 distinct written forms · 238 source rows
65 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 里
196 distinct written forms · 223 source rows
57 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 希
195 distinct written forms · 233 source rows
58 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 理
193 distinct written forms · 216 source rows
50 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 佐
192 distinct written forms · 210 source rows
36 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 都
188 distinct written forms · 265 source rows
71 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 香
184 distinct written forms · 211 source rows
53 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 千
182 distinct written forms · 233 source rows
47 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 三
180 distinct written forms · 215 source rows
59 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 和
176 distinct written forms · 226 source rows
66 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 紀
175 distinct written forms · 199 source rows
44 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 喜
172 distinct written forms · 199 source rows
53 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 佳
171 distinct written forms · 191 source rows
45 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 代
165 distinct written forms · 186 source rows
39 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 衣
162 distinct written forms · 203 source rows
68 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 沙
159 distinct written forms · 169 source rows
36 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 亜
158 distinct written forms · 180 source rows
41 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 智
157 distinct written forms · 189 source rows
52 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 志
157 distinct written forms · 179 source rows
43 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 由
156 distinct written forms · 176 source rows
38 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 久
156 distinct written forms · 169 source rows
38 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 麻
153 distinct written forms · 182 source rows
47 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 貴
148 distinct written forms · 175 source rows
46 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 知
147 distinct written forms · 186 source rows
46 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 利
144 distinct written forms · 154 source rows
38 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 菜
142 distinct written forms · 159 source rows
34 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 世
140 distinct written forms · 174 source rows
40 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 伊
135 distinct written forms · 147 source rows
44 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 紗
135 distinct written forms · 146 source rows
39 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 加
134 distinct written forms · 148 source rows
32 given-name readings · 0 surname readings子 + 有
133 distinct written forms · 179 source rows
52 given-name readings · 0 surname readingsCo-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.