Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
夢
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 13 strokes
生dream, vision, illusion
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 5 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →life, genuine, birth
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
夢向生
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameYūki
ゆうき
未夢生
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameMiyū
みゆう
夢生子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameYukiko
ゆきこ
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameYui
ゆい
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameYū
ゆう
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameIbuki
いぶき
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameYume
ゆめ
夢以生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameYuina
ゆいな
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameYumemi
ゆめみ
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameMū
むう
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameYumeki
ゆめき
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Given nameMusei
むせい
夢生
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 夢 and 生Yumeo
ゆめお
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.