Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

多

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 6 strokes

many, frequent, much

雄

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 12 strokes

masculine, male, hero

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both17

Distinct written forms17

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 多雄 forms3

Adjacent 雄多 forms0

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

多加雄

Takao

たかお

4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

多喜雄

Takio

たきお

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

多摩雄

Tamao

たまお

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

智多雄

Chitao

ちたお

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

多久雄

Takuo

たくお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

多美雄

Tamio

たみお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

多智雄

Tachio

たちお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

貴多雄

Kitao

きたお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

多仁雄

Tanio

たにお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄Given name

多志雄

Tashio

たしお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 多 and 雄

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.