Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
堅
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 12 strokes
田strict, hard, solid
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 5 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →rice field, rice paddy
Sparse evidence: this pair occurs in fewer than two distinct written forms in the active corpus. Treat it as a recorded example, not an established pattern.
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameKōda
こうだ
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameKanda
かんだ
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameKenda
けんだ
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameKatada
かただ
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameGenta
げんた
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameTateda
たてだ
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameGenda
げんだ
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameKakita
かきた
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameKashida
かしだ
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田SurnameKenta
けんた
堅田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 堅 and 田Katata
かたた
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.