Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
嘉
Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 14 strokes
津applaud, praise, esteem
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →haven, port, harbor
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
嘉津子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKazuko
かずこ
嘉津美
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKazumi
かずみ
志津嘉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameShizuka
しづか
嘉津枝
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKazue
かづえ
嘉津雄
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKazuo
かずお
嘉津美
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKatsumi
かつみ
嘉津子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKatsuko
かつこ
嘉津彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKatsuhiko
かつひこ
嘉津代
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKatsuyo
かつよ
嘉津
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKatsu
かつ
嘉津弥
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Given nameKatsuya
かつや
武嘉津
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 嘉 and 津Takekatsu
たけかつ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.