Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

喜

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 12 strokes

rejoice, take pleasure in

栄

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 9 strokes

flourish, prosperity, honor

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms10

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 喜栄 forms5

Adjacent 栄喜 forms1

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

喜実栄

Kimie

きみえ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

喜栄子

Kieko

きえこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

喜代栄

Kiyoe

きよえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

真喜栄

Makie

まきえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

喜久栄

Kikue

きくえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

富喜栄

Tokie

ときえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

栄喜

Eiki

えいき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

多喜栄

Takie

たきえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

喜栄

Yoshiei

よしえい

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄Given name

喜栄

Kiei

きえい

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 栄

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.