Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
喜
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 12 strokes
彦rejoice, take pleasure in
Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →lad, boy, fine young man
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
亜喜彦
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameAkihiko
あきひこ
他喜彦
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameTakihiko
たきひこ
喜与彦
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameKiyohiko
きよひこ
万喜彦
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameMakihiko
まきひこ
喜彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameYoshihiko
よしひこ
喜彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameNobuhiko
のぶひこ
勇喜彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameYukihiko
ゆきひこ
登喜彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameTokihiko
ときひこ
三喜彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameMikihiko
みきひこ
喜美彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameKimihiko
きみひこ
喜久彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Given nameKikuhiko
きくひこ
喜宇彦
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 喜 and 彦Kiuhiko
きうひこ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.