Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

善

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 6 · 12 strokes

virtuous, good, goodness

朗

Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 10 · 11 strokes

clear, bright, distinct

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both13

Distinct written forms8

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 善朗 forms1

Adjacent 朗善 forms0

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

善一朗

Zen'ichirō

ぜんいちろう

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善多朗

Zentarō

ぜんたろう

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善朗

Yoshio

よしお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善朗

Yoshiaki

よしあき

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善朗

Yoshirō

よしろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善朗

Yoshirō

よしろお

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善二朗

Zenjirō

ぜんじろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善三朗

Zenzaburō

ぜんざぶろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善三朗

Zensaburō

ぜんさぶろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗Given name

善朗

Zenrō

ぜんろう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 善 and 朗

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.