Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

和

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 8 strokes

harmony, Japanese style, peace

海

Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 10 · 10 strokes

KANJIDIC2 character record

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both10

Distinct written forms5

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 和海 forms1

Adjacent 海和 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

和海

Ami

あみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

和海

Kazumi

かずみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

和泉海

Izumi

いずみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

和海

Nami

なみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

海和

Miwa

みわ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

海和子

Miwako

みわこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

和海

Nagomi

なごみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

海和

Minagi

みなぎ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

海和

Kaina

かいな

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海Given name

和巨海

Kazuomi

かずおみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 海

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.