Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

和

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 8 strokes

harmony, Japanese style, peace

恵

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 10 strokes

favor, blessing, grace

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both15

Distinct written forms11

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 和恵 forms5

Adjacent 恵和 forms1

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

和佳恵

Wakae

わかえ

5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

実和恵

Miwae

みわえ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

和恵

Kazue

かずえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

恵和

Yoshikazu

よしかず

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

和恵

Kazuyoshi

かずよし

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

多和恵

Takae

たかえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

和恵子

Kaeko

かえこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

和恵

Kazuyo

かずよ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

和恵

Katsue

かつえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵Given name

恵和

Satona

さとな

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 恵

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.