Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
和
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 8 strokes
喜harmony, Japanese style, peace
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 12 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →rejoice, take pleasure in
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
喜和夫
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameKiwao
きわお
和喜夫
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameWakio
わきお
喜和
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameYoshikazu
よしかず
和喜
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameKazuyoshi
かずよし
和喜子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameWakiko
わきこ
和喜
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameKazuki
かずき
喜和子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameKiwako
きわこ
和喜
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameKazunobu
かずのぶ
喜和
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameKiwa
きわ
麻和喜
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameManaki
まなき
和喜
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Given nameWaki
わき
和喜蔵
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 和 and 喜Wakizō
わきぞう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.