Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
呂
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 7 strokes
麻spine, backbone
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 11 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →hemp, flax, numb
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
麻呂実
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameMaromi
まろみ
公麻呂
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameYoshimaro
よしまろ
麻比呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameMahiro
まひろ
麻帆呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameMahoro
まほろ
麻呂可
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameMaroka
まろか
秀麻呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameHidemaro
ひでまろ
富士麻呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameFujimaro
ふじまろ
勝麻呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameKatsumaro
かつまろ
和麻呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameKazumaro
かずまろ
茂麻呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameShigemaro
しげまろ
清麻呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Given nameKiyomaro
きよまろ
豊麻呂
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 呂 and 麻Toyomaro
とよまろ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.