Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
十
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 2 strokes
河ten
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 8 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →river
Sparse evidence: this pair occurs in fewer than two distinct written forms in the active corpus. Treat it as a recorded example, not an established pattern.
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameTogawa
とがわ
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameSogawa
そがわ
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameSoga
そが
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameTōgō
とうごう
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameSōkawa
そうかわ
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameTogō
とごう
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameTōkawa
とうかわ
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameTokawa
とかわ
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameSokawa
そかわ
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameSogō
そごう
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河SurnameTotsukawa
とつかわ
十河
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 十 and 河Tōga
とうが
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.