Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

加

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 5 strokes

add, addition, increase

阿

Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 8 strokes

Africa, flatter, fawn upon

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both35

Distinct written forms34

Given-name readings8

Surname readings2

Adjacent 加阿 forms0

Adjacent 阿加 forms4

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

阿恵加

Aeka

あえか

8 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Given name

阿佐加

Asaka

あさか

7 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Given name

阿佑加

Ayuka

あゆか

6 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Given name

阿也加

Ayaka

あやか

5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Given name

阿寿加

Asuka

あすか

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Given name

阿加根

Akane

あかね

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Given name

阿弥加

Amika

あみか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Given name

阿利加

Arika

ありか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Surname

阿加井

Akai

あかい

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿Surname

阿加

Aka

あか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 阿

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.