Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

加

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 5 strokes

add, addition, increase

弥

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 8 strokes

all the more, increasingly

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both15

Distinct written forms11

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 加弥 forms3

Adjacent 弥加 forms8

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

彩弥加

Sayaka

さやか

4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

安弥加

Ayaka

あやか

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

弥加

Mika

みか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

阿弥加

Amika

あみか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

弥加

Yoshika

よしか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

加弥子

Kayako

かやこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

加弥

Kaya

かや

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

弥加

Yasuka

やすか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

奈弥加

Namika

なみか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥Given name

加弥乃

Kayano

かやの

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 加 and 弥

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.