Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
剛
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 10 strokes
郎sturdy, strength
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 9 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →son, counter for sons
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
剛多郎
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameGōtarō
ごうたろう
剛一郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameKōichirō
こういちろう
剛二郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameKōjirō
こうじろう
剛郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameTakao
たかお
剛太郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameKōtarō
こうたろう
剛郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameTakeo
たけお
剛郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameYoshirō
よしろう
剛司郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameKōshirō
こうしろう
剛二郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameTakejirō
たけじろう
剛郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameTakerō
たけろう
剛太郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Given nameTaketarō
たけたろう
剛一郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 剛 and 郎Gōichirō
ごういちろう
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.