Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
利
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes
茉profit, advantage, benefit
Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 8 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →jasmine
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
茉利恵
4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMarie
まりえ
茉利佳
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMarika
まりか
亜茉利
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameAmari
あまり
茉利子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMariko
まりこ
茉利奈
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMarina
まりな
茉利
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMari
まり
茉利亜
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMaria
まりあ
妃茉利
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameHimari
ひまり
利茉
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameRima
りま
茉利依
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMarī
まりい
茉利萌
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMarimo
まりも
茉利弥
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Given nameMariya
まりや
茉利以奈
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 茉Marīna
まりいな
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.