Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
利
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes
代profit, advantage, benefit
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 5 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →substitute, change, convert
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
天利代
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameMariyo
まりよ
利代実
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameToyomi
とよみ
代利子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameYoriko
よりこ
展利代
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameNoriyo
のりよ
利代
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameRiyo
りよ
代利惠
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameYorie
よりえ
利代子
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameRiyoko
りよこ
利代
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameToshiyo
としよ
志代利
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameShiyori
しより
由利代
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameYuriyo
ゆりよ
利里代
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Given nameRiriyo
りりよ
利津代
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 利 and 代Ritsuyo
りつよ
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.