Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
保
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 9 strokes
志protect, guarantee, keep
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 7 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →intention, plan, resolve
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
志保沢
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameShiozawa
しおざわ
志保
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameShio
しお
保志野
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameHoshino
ほしの
保志名
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameHoshina
ほしな
志保田
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameShiota
しおた
保志
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameYasuji
やすじ
保志
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameHoshi
ほし
大志保
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameŌshio
おおしお
志保井
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameShioi
しおい
保志場
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameHoshiba
ほしば
志保
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameShiho
しほ
志保澤
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志SurnameShibosawa
しぼさわ
志保山
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 保 and 志Shidayama
しだやま
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.