Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

佳

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 8 strokes

excellent, beautiful, good

英

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 8 strokes

England, English, hero

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both17

Distinct written forms14

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 佳英 forms2

Adjacent 英佳 forms6

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

英吏佳

Erika

えりか

5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

亜英佳

Aeka

あえか

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

英佳

Eika

えいか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

佳英

Yoshie

よしえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

佳英

Kae

かえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

佳英子

Kaeko

かえこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

佳英

Yoshihide

よしひで

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

佳英

Yoshifusa

よしふさ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

里英佳

Rieka

りえか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英Given name

八英佳

Yaeka

やえか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 英

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.