Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

佳

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 8 strokes

excellent, beautiful, good

真

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 10 strokes

true, reality, Buddhist sect

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both23

Distinct written forms21

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 佳真 forms0

Adjacent 真佳 forms1

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

真佑佳

Mayuka

まゆか

5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真利佳

Marika

まりか

5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真佳

Manaka

まなか

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真佳

Madoka

まどか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真実佳

Mamika

まみか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真也佳

Mayaka

まやか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真衣佳

Maika

まいか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真佳

Michiyoshi

みちよし

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真世佳

Mayoka

まよか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真Given name

真野佳

Manoka

まのか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 真

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.