Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

佳

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 8 strokes

excellent, beautiful, good

久

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 3 strokes

long time, old story

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both12

Distinct written forms9

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 佳久 forms5

Adjacent 久佳 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

佳久実

Kakumi

かくみ

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

佳久

Yoshihisa

よしひさ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

久佳

Hisayoshi

ひさよし

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

佳久子

Kakuko

かくこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

久佳

Tsuneyoshi

つねよし

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

久未佳

Kumika

くみか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

久佳

Hisaka

ひさか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

佳久

Kaku

かく

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

暉久佳

Kikuka

きくか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久Given name

久寿佳

Kusuka

くすか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 佳 and 久

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.