Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

伽

Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 7 strokes

nursing, attending, entertainer

里

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 7 strokes

ri, village, parent's home

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both16

Distinct written forms16

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 伽里 forms8

Adjacent 里伽 forms5

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

亜伽里

Akari

あかり

4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

友伽里

Yukari

ゆかり

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

友里伽

Yurika

ゆりか

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

光伽里

Hikari

ひかり

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

里伽

Rika

りか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

里莉伽

Ririka

りりか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

瀬里伽

Serika

せりか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

里伽子

Rikako

りかこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

伽奈里

Kanari

かなり

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里Given name

里央伽

Rioka

りおか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 伽 and 里

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.