Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

亜

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 8 · 7 strokes

Asia, rank next, come after

見

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 1 · 7 strokes

see, hopes, chances

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both34

Distinct written forms34

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 亜見 forms17

Adjacent 見亜 forms0

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

亜佑見

Ayumi

あゆみ

12 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

亜見利

Amiri

あみり

6 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

亜見恵

Amie

あみえ

5 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

亜沙見

Asami

あさみ

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

亜見乃

Amino

あみの

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

亜見世

Amiyo

あみよ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

亜見

Ami

あみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

亜鷲見

Azumi

あずみ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

亜見子

Amiko

あみこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見Given name

見梨亜

Miria

みりあ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 亜 and 見

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.