Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

久

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 3 strokes

long time, old story

理

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 11 strokes

logic, arrangement, reason

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both11

Distinct written forms9

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 久理 forms7

Adjacent 理久 forms2

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

久理実

Kurimi

くりみ

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

理久

Yoshihisa

よしひさ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

理久

Riku

りく

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

久理子

Kuriko

くりこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

亜久理

Aguri

あぐり

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

久理亜

Kuria

くりあ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

久理加

Kurika

くりか

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

理久子

Rikuko

りくこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

久理恵

Kurie

くりえ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理Given name

理久

Rikyū

りきゅう

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 理

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.