Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
久
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 3 strokes
治long time, old story
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 8 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →reign, be at peace, calm down
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
亀久治
3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameKikuji
きくじ
冨久治
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameFukuji
ふくじ
嘉久治
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameKakuji
かくじ
久治
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameHisaharu
ひさはる
久治
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameHisaji
ひさじ
喜久治郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameKikujirō
きくじろう
佐久治
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameSakuji
さくじ
治久
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameHaruhisa
はるひさ
久治
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameKyūji
きゅうじ
久治郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameHisajirō
ひさじろう
久治郎
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Given nameKyūjirō
きゅうじろう
喜久治
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 治Kikuharu
きくはる
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.