Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
久
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 5 · 3 strokes
地long time, old story
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 6 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →ground, earth
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Surname
喜久地
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameKikuchi
きくち
戸久地
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameToguchi
とぐち
戸久地
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameTokuchi
とくち
地久間
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameChikuma
ちくま
久地
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameKuji
くじ
伊久地
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameIkuji
いくじ
馬久地
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameMakuchi
まくち
渡久地
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameTokuji
とくじ
久地
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameKuchi
くち
久地井
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameKuchī
くちい
久地楽
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameKujira
くぢら
久間地
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地SurnameKumaji
くまじ
渡久地
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 久 and 地Watakuchi
わたくち
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.