Corpus composition research
Kanji Pair Research
Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.
乃
Jinmeiyō · KANJIDIC grade 9 · 2 strokes
真from, possessive particle, whereupon
Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 3 · 10 strokes
Find exact-kanji names →true, reality, Buddhist sect
Recorded names
Name readings containing both characters
The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.
Given name
真喜乃
8 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameMakino
まきの
真凜乃
7 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameMarino
まりの
真友乃
4 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameMayuno
まゆの
真唯乃
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameMaino
まいの
真乃亜
2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameManoa
まのあ
真乃介
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameShinnosuke
しんのすけ
真乃
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameMasano
まさの
真珠乃
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameShizuno
しずの
真乃
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameMano
まの
真智乃
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameMachino
まちの
真耶乃
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Given nameMayano
まやの
真由乃
1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 乃 and 真Myūna
みゅうな
Evidence boundary
Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology
The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.