Corpus composition research

Kanji Pair Research

Enter one kanji to discover other characters recorded in the same JMnedict name spellings, or enter two kanji to inspect that exact co-occurrence. Every count in this research view describes the imported corpus—not population popularity in Japan.

万

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 2 · 3 strokes

ten thousand, 10,000

利

Jōyō · KANJIDIC grade 4 · 7 strokes

profit, advantage, benefit

Find exact-kanji names →

Source rows containing both13

Distinct written forms11

Given-name readings10

Surname readings0

Adjacent 万利 forms10

Adjacent 利万 forms0

Recorded names

Name readings containing both characters

The pair only has to occur in the same written form; the two kanji are not required to be adjacent unless counted in the adjacency statistics above.

Given name

万利恵

Marie

まりえ

3 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

亜万利

Amari

あまり

2 source-recorded spellings in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

万利子

Mariko

まりこ

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

万利奈

Marina

まりな

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

万利

Mari

まり

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

万由利

Mayuri

まゆり

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

万利依

Marī

まりい

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

万利

Kazutoshi

かずとし

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

万利

Banri

ばんり

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 万 and 利Given name

万利以奈

Marīna

まりいな

1 source-recorded spelling in this reading group contain both 万 and 利

Evidence boundary

Co-occurrence is not popularity or etymology

The pair relation comes from exact JMnedict source rows through the compact kanji-usage index. KANJIDIC2 contributes character metadata only. A high corpus count can reflect dictionary coverage and should not be read as a national usage frequency.