Japanese Name Explorer
Combine pronunciation, written-form and corpus classifications to find source-recorded names. Filters are a research utility: combinations stay temporary and canonical name pages remain the primary reference records.
Hinane
4 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsKanane
3 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMiona
21 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNanane
5 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNanon
5 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · mixed classified recordsNao
110 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNaoko
118 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · mixed classified recordsNaomi
147 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNaona
5 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNaori
18 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · mixed classified recordsNaoto
22 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNatsune
7 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNena
3 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · mixed classified recordsReona
51 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →What the explorer can and cannot tell you
Exact-kanji filters require the selected character(s) to occur in the same JMnedict written form. Morae are calculated from the source-recorded kana reading. Gender labels reflect dictionary classifications in the imported records. “Most corpus spelling variants” measures source-record coverage only; it is not a popularity ranking in Japan.