Japanese Name Explorer
Combine pronunciation, written-form and corpus classifications to find source-recorded names. Filters are a research utility: combinations stay temporary and canonical name pages remain the primary reference records.
Aiko
111 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsChīko
57 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsEiko
98 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsEmiko
156 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsIchiko
54 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsIko
16 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsItsuko
64 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsKeiko
141 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsKīko
23 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNoriko
174 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsSamiko
17 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsSeiko
79 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsTaiko
30 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsTakako
132 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →What the explorer can and cannot tell you
Exact-kanji filters require the selected character(s) to occur in the same JMnedict written form. Morae are calculated from the source-recorded kana reading. Gender labels reflect dictionary classifications in the imported records. “Most corpus spelling variants” measures source-record coverage only; it is not a popularity ranking in Japan.