Japanese Name Explorer
Combine pronunciation, written-form and corpus classifications to find source-recorded names. Filters are a research utility: combinations stay temporary and canonical name pages remain the primary reference records.
Kokomo
4 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomo
35 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomoa
13 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomoe
39 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomoha
14 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomoho
5 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · mixed classified recordsMomoka
85 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomoki
14 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomoko
41 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomomi
20 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomona
15 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsMomone
11 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsNanamo
3 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →Given name · includes female-classified recordsSumomo
10 recorded spellings in the imported corpus
Inspect evidence →What the explorer can and cannot tell you
Exact-kanji filters require the selected character(s) to occur in the same JMnedict written form. Morae are calculated from the source-recorded kana reading. Gender labels reflect dictionary classifications in the imported records. “Most corpus spelling variants” measures source-record coverage only; it is not a popularity ranking in Japan.